pediaret.blogg.se

1. #Does nvda screen reader work with a mac how to
2. #Does nvda screen reader work with a mac android
3. #Does nvda screen reader work with a mac code
4. #Does nvda screen reader work with a mac free
5. #Does nvda screen reader work with a mac windows

I am not sure but I thought quck nav might be a little weird behaving sometimes.

#Does nvda screen reader work with a mac windows

I know about quick nav, but even though they came up with h heading v visited link, e for edit fields, windows it's just there, whereas you'd need to turn on quick nav feature. The mac, however thoughintuitive, isn't really because unless you've had an iPhone, even if you had, you're stuck holding down two keys.

#Does nvda screen reader work with a mac how to

NVDA is based off of jaws for windows, so if you can't aford the "better" screen reader, you can at least understand that even playing with a demo, you will have a very generic idea of how to useit. Ok before people flip, here's what I'm saying. So, any comparisons like that - things that annoy you about one or the other, places where one seems more efficient than the other, etc., would be great. In my brief experience playing with Voiceover, I felt like navigating between elements of a page (such as jumping from a sidebar or toolbar to a main content area) might be a little more clunky than I'm used to - but that could just be a lack of familiarity with the way things are laid out in OSX. Does one seem more efficient than the other? Which one do you find more seamlessly gets you where you need to go within various programs? Do you find that one hinders your productivity or gets in your way more? For example, when listening to podcasts of people using VO, I sometimes feel that it reports a lot of information that I'd find extraneous, which would be less efficient in the long run - but I had the same thought about NVDA, until I realized I could turn off things like reporting table position, etc. Still, I'm interested in the thoughts of anyone who has used both screen readers heavily. I recognize that when you compare these two, it's not really an apples-to-apples comparison because they're for completely different operating systems.

#Does nvda screen reader work with a mac free

Hope this is helpful! Any views & opinions can be shared in comments section.I was hoping to seek some thoughts on the comparison between screen readers - particularly the two free ones, NVDA for Windows and VO for Mac. If something doesn’t work, then cross testing on a different browser/platform can determine if it is a browser or screen reader bug. Most of the HTML5 & WAI-ARIA attributes are supported on all these platforms.

#Does nvda screen reader work with a mac code

If you have written a clean code that is semantic & follows all W3C Standards then testing on these platforms will suffice. So let’s answer the question, which screen reader should I use for accessibility testing? In my opinion & my experience, this is the matrix that I have come up with and now for your view: Secondly, testing with all browsers VS screen readers is a costly affair as it consumes a lot of resources, time and money too. Not every attribute is supported by all the screen readers. The same is true when we talk of the screen readers too.

Firstly, the support for HTML attributes and ARIA attributes by the browser vendors vary a lot. Even according to NVAccess, creators of NVDA the best browser that NVDA supports is Firefox.īesides, there are other factors too that attribute to the AT testing conundrum. Screen Reader & BrowserĪt my work place we follow testing on Firefox with NVDA screen reader & if we encounter any bugs related to either screen reader or the browser, we immediately raise the bugs with the vendor. During my day to day accessibility testing I use NVDA with Firefox & sometimes I also use NVDA with Chrome to see if any ARIA or HTML5 attribute is not being supported by the browser or the screen reader.

I personally prefer JAWS with Internet Explorer & JAWS with Chrome as the new version of Firefox doesn’t work with JAWS yet. BrowserĪccording to WebAIM Screen reader survey we can clearly see from the below table that JAWS works great on Internet Explorer followed by NVDA with Firefox.

#Does nvda screen reader work with a mac android

When it comes to IOS & OSx Safari is the most popular browser & on Android Chrome & Firefox both hold a good position. Definitely assistive technology users prefer Firefox over Chrome for their day to day activities. But according to WebAIM screen reader survey7 conducted in 2017, Firefox stands first followed by internet Explorer & in 3rd place is Chrome. These stats are true for both desktop & mobile. Popular BrowsersĪccording to Wikipedia, chrome holds the majority share for the browser market followed by Safari. Testing with every screen reader on every browser is not feasible if not impossible. Whenever I say that I make web & mobile Apps accessible for the disability groups, the first question some of the educated developers who understand accessibility ask me is, what browsers you test your APP’s on & which screen readers do you use? This is a very interesting question because, there are a wide variety of browsers & screen readers that are available in the market.